ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00004500-e5273c83

Lucinactant vs Standard Care: Number of Participants With Air Leaks

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Lucinactant vs Standard Care: Number of Participants With Air Leaks. Trial comparisons, record NCT00004500-e5273c83. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00004500-e5273c83

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.05260.01460.173wilson
Risk in group 2000.11wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.0526-0.0640.173newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Lucinactant than on Standard Care19from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: standard care.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1LucinactantLucinactant via bronchoaveolar lavage238OG000
Group 2Standard CareStandard Care included the use of oxygen, CMV, sedation, paralysis, vasopressors, and/or alkalinization031OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Number of Participants With Air Leaks
Description
Includes pulmonary interstitial emphysema (PIE), Pneumothorax, Pneumomediastinium, and Pneumopericardium
Time frame
28 days
Population
Data from the initial Phase 1/2 trial were used to estimate the number of subjects required for testing the null hypothesis of no difference between treatment groups. A sample size of 100 subjects per group is required to test the hypothesis at a significance level of 0.05 with a power of 80%.~All enrolled infants were analyzed (intent-to-treat).

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Phase III Randomized Study of Lucinactant in Full Term Newborn Infants With Meconium Aspiration Syndrome
NCT number
NCT00004500
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Meconium Aspiration
Interventions
Lucinactant, Standard Care
Lead sponsor
Windtree Therapeutics
Results first posted
2012-05-01

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00004500-e5273c83