Comparison · NCT00071032-sae
Liberal (10 g/dL) Transfusion Strategy vs Restrictive Strategy: serious adverse events
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Liberal (10 g/dL) Transfusion Strategy vs Restrictive Strategy: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00071032-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00071032-sae
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0.0755 | 0.0607 | 0.0934 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0.0654 | 0.0517 | 0.0824 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | 0.0101 | -0.0124 | 0.0326 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 1.15 | 0.84 | 1.59 | log | |
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 1.17 | 0.829 | 1.64 | log | |
| Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on Liberal (10 g/dL) Transfusion Strategy than on Restrictive Strategy | 99.4 | from the risk difference interval | the interval includes no difference |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Liberal (10 g/dL) Transfusion Strategy | Transfusion strategy that maintains post randomization Hgb levels \>= 10 g/dL | 76 | 1,007 | EG000 |
| Group 2 | Restrictive Strategy | Symptomatic transfusion strategy, in which blood transfusion is withheld until the patient develops symptoms of anemia or at physician discretion of the hemoglobin level falls below 8 g/dL | 66 | 1,009 | EG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Harm
- What it counts
- Total, serious adverse events
- Time frame
- Up to 60 days following randomization
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- Safety and Effectiveness of Two Blood Transfusion Strategies in Surgical Patients With Cardiovascular Disease
- NCT number
- NCT00071032
- Phases
- PHASE3
- Conditions
- Anemia, Hematologic Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases, Myocardial Infarction, Thromboembolism, Pneumonia, Cerebrovascular Accident
- Interventions
- Liberal (10 g/dL) Transfusion Strategy, Restrictive (Symptomatic) Transfusion Strategy
- Lead sponsor
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
- Results first posted
- 2014-08-28
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00071032?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00071032-sae