ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00081653-sae

Ibandronate 100 mg vs Ibandronate 150 mg: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Ibandronate 100 mg vs Ibandronate 150 mg: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00081653-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00081653-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.190.1530.234wilson
Risk in group 20.1940.1560.238wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.00396-0.06160.0537newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.980.7261.32log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.9750.6721.41log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with a serious adverse event on Ibandronate 100 mg than on Ibandronate 150 mg252from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Ibandronate 100 mg100 mg ibandronate PO monthly and monthly oral placebo (corresponding to the 150 mg tablet)68358EG000
Group 2Ibandronate 150 mg150 mg ibandronate PO monthly and monthly oral placebo (corresponding to the 100 mg tablet)70361EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
Adverse events were recorded from the date of informed consent until 15 days after the final visit at 36 months.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Study of Bonviva (Ibandronate) in Women With Post-Menopausal Osteoporosis Previously Treated With Bonviva
NCT number
NCT00081653
Phases
PHASE4
Conditions
Post-Menopausal Osteoporosis
Interventions
ibandronate [Bonviva/Boniva], ibandronate [Bonviva/Boniva]
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Results first posted
2009-07-21

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00081653-sae