ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00083551-sae

Thalidomide vs No Thalidomide: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Thalidomide vs No Thalidomide: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00083551-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00083551-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 110.9881wilson
Risk in group 210.9891wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20-0.01180.011newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2111log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to harmfrom the risk difference intervalthe two groups' risks are equal

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1ThalidomideThalidomide 400 QD during induction, 100 mg QD between transplants, 200 mg QD post transplant, 100 mg QD during year one of maintenance, and 50 mg QD during second year of maintenance.323323EG000
Group 2No ThalidomidePatient received no thalidomide during induction, consolidation, and maintenance therapy.345345EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
UARK 98-026 TT II: Multiple Myeloma Evaluating Anti-Angiogenesis With Thalidomide and Post-Transplant Consolidation Chemotherapy
NCT number
NCT00083551
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Multiple Myeloma
Interventions
Thalidomide, Ara-C, BCNU, Cisplatin, Cytoxan, Dexamethasone, Doxorubicin, Etoposide, Filgrastim, Recombinant GM-CSF, Interferon-alpha-2b, Melphalan, Vincristine
Lead sponsor
University of Arkansas
Results first posted
2015-09-22

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00083551-sae