ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00089479-sae

AC Then T vs AC Then XT: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. AC Then T vs AC Then XT: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00089479-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00089479-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.2020.1810.225wilson
Risk in group 20.1560.1370.177wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.04640.01690.0759newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.31.11.53log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.371.121.68log
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on AC Then T than on AC Then XT21.513.259.3from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1AC Then TAdriamycin 60 mg/m\^2 iv plus Cytoxan 600 mg/m\^2 iv repeat every 3 weeks for 4 cycles followed by Taxotere 100 mg/m\^2; repeat every 3 weeks for 4 cycles2641,305EG000
Group 2AC Then XT
Adriamycin 60 mg/m\^2 iv plus Cytoxan 600 mg/m\^2 iv repeat every 3 weeks for 4 cycles followed by Xeloda 825 mg/m\^2 po (bid) \[total daily dose is 1650 mg/m\^2\] Days 1-14 every 3 weeks for 4 cycles plus Taxotere 75 mg/m\^2 iv every 3 weeks for 4 cycles
2001,283EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
Length of study

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Study of Xeloda (Capecitabine) in Women With High-Risk Breast Cancer
NCT number
NCT00089479
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Breast Cancer
Interventions
capecitabine [Xeloda], Taxotere, Taxotere
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Results first posted
2011-06-23

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00089479-sae