ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trial comparisons

Denosumab 60 mg Q6M vs Placebo: Number of Participants With New Vertebral Fractures

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

Measures 6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNoteSource
Risk in group 10.02320.01880.0286wilsonClinicalTrials.gov
Risk in group 20.07150.06360.0803wilsonClinicalTrials.gov
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0483-0.0581-0.0388newcombe hybrid scoreClinicalTrials.gov
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.3250.2560.412logClinicalTrials.gov
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.3090.2410.396logClinicalTrials.gov
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Denosumab 60 mg Q6M than on Placebo20.717.225.8from the risk difference intervalClinicalTrials.gov

Groups 2

Group 2 names the comparator: placebo.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov codeSource
Group 1Denosumab 60 mg Q6MDenosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously once every 6 months (Q6M) for 3 years.863,702OG001ClinicalTrials.gov
Group 2PlaceboPlacebo administered subcutaneously once every 6 months for 3 years.2643,691OG000ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcome 5

FieldValueSource
TypePRIMARYClinicalTrials.gov
TitleNumber of Participants With New Vertebral FracturesClinicalTrials.gov
Description
A new vertebral fracture, assessed by lateral spine X-ray using Genant semiquantitative scoring method, was identified as an ≥ 1 grade increase from the Baseline grade of 0 in any vertebra from T4 to L4. New vertebral fractures included morphometric vertebral fractures (assessed at scheduled visits and not associated with signs or symptoms \[or both\] indicative of a fracture) and clinical vertebral fractures (assessed at either a scheduled or unscheduled visit and associated with any signs and/or symptoms indicative of a fracture, excluding any fracture associated with high trauma severity or a pathologic fracture).
ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame36 monthsClinicalTrials.gov
Population
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set, which includes all randomized participants who have a baseline and ≥ 1 postbaseline evaluation of vertebral fracture at or before 3 years. Last Observation Carried Forward was used.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial 8

FieldValueSource
TitleA Study to Evaluate Denosumab in the Treatment of Postmenopausal OsteoporosisClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT00089791ClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesPHASE3ClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsOsteoporosisClinicalTrials.gov
Interventionsplacebo, DenosumabClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorAmgenClinicalTrials.gov
Results first posted2014-01-10ClinicalTrials.gov
Results on ClinicalTrials.govhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00089791?tab=resultsClinicalTrials.gov

Source 4

FieldValueSource
Releasetrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-256f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57ClinicalTrials.gov
AACT copy2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
Tables readoutcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquetClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.