ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00112385-fb1a8ccc

Etanercept vs Placebo: Frequency of Subjects With Treatment Emergent, Clinically Significant, Abnormal Antinuclear Antibody Test (ANA) Values From the Screening Visit to Week 52

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Etanercept vs Placebo: Frequency of Subjects With Treatment Emergent, Clinically Significant, Abnormal Antinuclear Antibody Test (ANA) Values From the Screening Visit to Week 52. Trial comparisons, record NCT00112385-fb1a8ccc. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00112385-fb1a8ccc

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.09090.01620.377wilson
Risk in group 2000.434wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.0909-0.350.377newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Etanercept than on Placebo11from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: placebo.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1EtanerceptSubjects randomized to Etanercept will be provided with syringes contain 50 mg and will be injected SQ once a week for 52 wks111OG000
Group 2PlaceboSubjects will be given syringes containing placebo05OG001

Outcome

Type
PRIMARY
Title
Frequency of Subjects With Treatment Emergent, Clinically Significant, Abnormal Antinuclear Antibody Test (ANA) Values From the Screening Visit to Week 52
Description
The site investigators used the reference ranges provided by the lab that completed the testing of the sample to determine if the value was abnormal. If a value was abnormal, the site investigator would determine if the value was clinically significant or not.~A subject was considered to have a treatment emergent, clinically significant value if during the course of the study, they had at least one clinically significant Antinuclear Antibody Test (ANA) result that was not present at baseline. Subjects had ANA labs collected at Screening, Week 12, 24, 40, and 52.
Time frame
At Screening, Week 12, 24, 40, and 52
Population
Data for all subjects in the trial are not available for this assessment at all time points. One subject in the placebo group left the study before week 52. One subject in the etanercept group was lost to follow-up before the Week 52 visit.~Data may also be missing due to the subject's refusal to complete an assessment or examiner error.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Pilot Study of Etanercept in Dermatomyositis
NCT number
NCT00112385
Phases
PHASE1
Conditions
Dermatomyositis
Interventions
Etanercept, Placebo
Lead sponsor
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Results first posted
2011-06-21

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00112385-fb1a8ccc