ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00126191-sae

Low Risk vs High Risk: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Low Risk vs High Risk: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00126191-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00126191-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.50.09450.905wilson
Risk in group 20.250.07150.591wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.25-0.280.693newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 220.3212.5log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 230.12273.6log
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on Low Risk than on High Risk4from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Low RiskRegimen A. Single focus of disease less than 10 cm in greatest dimension and a normal LDH. Participants at low risk received three cycles of Regimen A (AAA).12EG000
Group 2High RiskRegimen A followed by Regimen B. Cycles A and B will then be repeated (ABAB).28EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Intensive Chemotherapy and Rituximab in the Treatment of Burkitt Lymphoma
NCT number
NCT00126191
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
Burkitt Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma, Atypical Burkitt Lymphoma
Interventions
Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, Methotrexate, Leucovorin, Ifosfamide, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Mesna
Lead sponsor
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Results first posted
2013-05-23

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00126191-sae