ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00130247-sae

4-Month Arm vs 6-Month Arm: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. 4-Month Arm vs 6-Month Arm: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00130247-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00130247-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.09690.06290.146wilson
Risk in group 20.1110.07450.162wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0142-0.07580.0474newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.8720.4881.56log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.8590.4491.64log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with a serious adverse event on 4-Month Arm than on 6-Month Arm70.6from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 14-Month ArmDaily treatment with INH, rifampicin, ethambutol and pyrazinamide for 2 months followed by 2 months of daily INH plus rifampicin over a maximum time period of 18 weeks.19196EG000
Group 26-Month ArmDaily treatment with INH, rifampicin, ethambutol and pyrazinamide for 2 months followed by 4 months of daily INH plus rifampicin over a maximum time period of 28 weeks.22198EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
6 years

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Tuberculosis Treatment Shortening Trial
NCT number
NCT00130247
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Tuberculosis
Interventions
Ethambutol, Isoniazid, Pyrazinamide, Rifampin
Lead sponsor
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Results first posted
2010-01-27

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00130247-sae