Comparison · NCT00187278-sae
RV Pacing vs Biventricular Pacing: serious adverse events
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. RV Pacing vs Biventricular Pacing: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00187278-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00187278-sae
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0.706 | 0.675 | 0.735 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0.774 | 0.745 | 0.8 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | -0.0679 | -0.108 | -0.0275 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 0.912 | 0.864 | 0.964 | log | |
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 0.702 | 0.568 | 0.867 | log | |
| Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with a serious adverse event on RV Pacing than on Biventricular Pacing | 14.7 | 9.26 | 36.4 | from the risk difference interval |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | RV Pacing | Standard Pacemaker implant | 641 | 908 | EG000 |
| Group 2 | Biventricular Pacing | Biventricular Pacemaker implant | 698 | 902 | EG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Harm
- What it counts
- Total, serious adverse events
- Time frame
- Study duration (5.7 years mean follow-up)
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- Biopace Study: Biventricular Pacing for Atrioventricular Block to Prevent Cardiac Desynchronization
- NCT number
- NCT00187278
- Phases
- NA
- Conditions
- Atrioventricular Block, Ventricular Dysfunction
- Interventions
- Biventricular Pacing, RV Pacing
- Lead sponsor
- Abbott Medical Devices
- Results first posted
- 2021-01-25
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00187278?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00187278-sae