ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00235495-2ed95f0d

Albumin vs Saline: Recurrent Ischemic Stroke Within 30 Days

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Albumin vs Saline: Recurrent Ischemic Stroke Within 30 Days. Trial comparisons, record NCT00235495-2ed95f0d. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00235495-2ed95f0d

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.01880.009120.0382wilson
Risk in group 20.01620.007450.0349wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.00255-0.01850.0239newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.160.3933.41log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.160.3863.49log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Albumin than on Saline392from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1AlbuminTreatment with 25% Albumin, 2.0 g/kg7373OG000
Group 2SalineTreatment with same volume of normal saline6370OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Recurrent Ischemic Stroke Within 30 Days
Description
Time frame
within 30 days
Population
The safety sample consisted of the 830 subjects who received at least 20% of the indented dose of study-drug. In order to be considered for this analysis, subject must have had the event within the time frame or been followed for at least 30 days.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Albumin in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trial
NCT number
NCT00235495
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Ischemic Stroke
Interventions
Albumin, Saline
Lead sponsor
University of Miami
Results first posted
2019-09-11

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00235495-2ed95f0d