ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00247273-992c8f87

5 mg Risedronate vs 150 mg Risedronate: Number of Participants With New Vertebral Fracture at Month 12, ITT Population

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. 5 mg Risedronate vs 150 mg Risedronate: Number of Participants With New Vertebral Fracture at Month 12, ITT Population. Trial comparisons, record NCT00247273-992c8f87. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00247273-992c8f87

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.01250.006330.0244wilson
Risk in group 20.01230.006250.0241wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.000153-0.01310.0135newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.010.3822.68log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.010.3782.71log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on 5 mg Risedronate than on 150 mg Risedronate6,520from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 15 mg Risedronate5 mg risedronate tablet, once daily for 2 years8642OG000
Group 2150 mg Risedronate150 mg risedronate taken once a month for 2 years8650OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Number of Participants With New Vertebral Fracture at Month 12, ITT Population
Description
At least 1 new fractured vertebra
Time frame
Baseline to Month 12
Population
ITT

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Study of Monthly Risedronate for Osteoporosis
NCT number
NCT00247273
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
Interventions
risedronate, risedronate
Lead sponsor
Warner Chilcott
Results first posted
2011-06-21

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00247273-992c8f87