ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00253435-sae

Poor Risk Patients vs Good Risk Patients: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Poor Risk Patients vs Good Risk Patients: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00253435-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00253435-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.2860.1720.436wilson
Risk in group 20.3750.1370.694wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0893-0.4280.192newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.7620.2762.1log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.6670.1373.24log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with a serious adverse event on Poor Risk Patients than on Good Risk Patients11.2from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Poor Risk PatientsPoor risk patients are those who experienced a Minor response (MR) or No Response (NR) to induction therapy or progressive disease (PD) during or following induction.1242EG000
Group 2Good Risk PatientsGood risk patients are those who experienced a Partial Response (PR) following 4 cycles of induction.38EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
N2001-02: I-MIBG With Intensive Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Rescue for High-Risk Neuroblastoma
NCT number
NCT00253435
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
Neuroblastoma
Interventions
Filgrastim, Carboplatin, Etoposide, Melphalan, Peripheral blood stem cell infusion, 131I-MIBG, Radiation therapy
Lead sponsor
New Approaches to Neuroblastoma Therapy Consortium
Results first posted
2016-08-24

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00253435-sae