ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00274261-1cfcf389

C31G Vaginal Gel vs Conceptrol® Vaginal Gel: Incidence of Adverse Events.

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. C31G Vaginal Gel vs Conceptrol® Vaginal Gel: Incidence of Adverse Events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00274261-1cfcf389. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00274261-1cfcf389

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.6620.6310.692wilson
Risk in group 20.6860.6480.721wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0236-0.07030.024newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.9660.91.04log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.8980.7241.11log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on C31G Vaginal Gel than on Conceptrol® Vaginal Gel42.4from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1C31G Vaginal Gel
C31G vaginal gel contains 35mg (1% concentration) of C31G in 3.5 mL volume of gel~C31G: The subject will insert one applicator of C31G prior to each episode of vaginal intercourse during her participation in the study.
617932OG000
Group 2Conceptrol® Vaginal Gel
Conceptrol® Vaginal gel contains 100mg (4% concentration) of nonoxynol-9 (N-9) in 2.5 mL volume of gel.~nonoxynol-9 (N-9): The subject will insert one applicator of Conceptrol® vaginal gel (nonoxynol-9) prior to each episode of vaginal intercourse during her participation in the study.
434633OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Incidence of Adverse Events.
Description
Evaluated by comparing the incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) among subjects using their assigned treatment for at least one day.
Time frame
duration of the study - through 6 month or 12 months of use
Population

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Study of the Safety and Contraceptive Efficacy of C31G Compared to Conceptrol®
NCT number
NCT00274261
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Pregnancy
Interventions
C31G, nonoxynol-9 (N-9)
Lead sponsor
Premier Research
Results first posted
2013-06-06

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00274261-1cfcf389