ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00285779-sae

Etanercept vs Placebo Injection: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Etanercept vs Placebo Injection: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00285779-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00285779-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.04170.007390.202wilson
Risk in group 200.00000000000000001390.215wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.0417-0.1760.202newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on Etanercept than on Placebo Injection24from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: placebo.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1EtanerceptEtanercept: etanercept 50 mg twice weekly for 12 weeks124EG001
Group 2Placebo InjectionPlacebo: Normal saline twice weekly for 12 weeks014EG000

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
This includes the entire 32 week timeframe of the trial. Thus, the placebo patients that cross over to etanercept from 12-24 weeks are also considered in the etanercept group during the 12-24 week timeframe. Also includes followup from 24-32 weeks.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Use of Etanercept in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Lichen Planus
NCT number
NCT00285779
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
Lichen Planus
Interventions
Etanercept, Placebo
Lead sponsor
Stanford University
Results first posted
2015-03-03

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00285779-sae