Comparison · NCT00294047-38887963
Cervarix Group vs Aluminium Hydroxide Group: Number of Subjects With Histopathologically Confirmed Reduction of Local Cervical Therapy
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Cervarix Group vs Aluminium Hydroxide Group: Number of Subjects With Histopathologically Confirmed Reduction of Local Cervical Therapy. Trial comparisons, record NCT00294047-38887963. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00294047-38887963
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0.0277 | 0.0222 | 0.0346 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0.0307 | 0.0249 | 0.0378 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | -0.00295 | -0.012 | 0.00604 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 0.904 | 0.666 | 1.23 | log | |
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 0.901 | 0.658 | 1.23 | log | |
| Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Cervarix Group than on Aluminium Hydroxide Group | 339 | from the risk difference interval | the interval includes no difference |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Cervarix Group | Subjects received 3 doses of Cervarix™ vaccine. Cervarix vaccine was administered intramuscularly into the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm according to a 0, 1, 6 months schedule. | 76 | 2,740 | OG000 |
| Group 2 | Aluminium Hydroxide Group | Subjects received 3 doses of Aluminium Hydroxide \[Al(OH)3\]. Aluminium Hydroxide was administered intramuscularly into the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm according to a 0, 1, 6 months schedule. | 84 | 2,737 | OG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcome
- Type
- SECONDARY
- Title
- Number of Subjects With Histopathologically Confirmed Reduction of Local Cervical Therapy
- Description
- Detection was done on all subjects irrespective of their baseline HPV DNA status.
- Time frame
- Up to Month 48
- Population
- The Total Vaccinated cohort included all subjects with at least one vaccine administration documented.
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine in Healthy Adult Women of 26 Years of Age and Older
- NCT number
- NCT00294047
- Phases
- PHASE3
- Conditions
- Infections, Papillomavirus, Papillomavirus Vaccines
- Interventions
- Cervarix, Placebo control
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Results first posted
- 2012-03-27
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00294047?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNone stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00294047-38887963