ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00294047-sae

Cervarix Group vs Aluminium Hydroxide Group: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Cervarix Group vs Aluminium Hydroxide Group: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00294047-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00294047-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.1010.09050.113wilson
Risk in group 20.09370.08360.105wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.00731-0.008030.0227newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.080.9211.26log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.090.9131.29log
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on Cervarix Group than on Aluminium Hydroxide Group137from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Cervarix GroupSubjects received 3 doses of Cervarix™ vaccine. Cervarix vaccine was administered intramuscularly into the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm according to a 0, 1, 6 months schedule.2912,881EG000
Group 2Aluminium Hydroxide Group
Subjects received 3 doses of Aluminium Hydroxide \[Al(OH)3\]. Aluminium Hydroxide was administered intramuscularly into the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm according to a 0, 1, 6 months schedule.
2692,871EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
SAEs: from the beginning of the study up to Month 84. Unsolicited AEs: within 30 days (Days 0-29) post-vaccination period). Solicited AEs: During the 7-day (Days 0-6) post-vaccination period.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine in Healthy Adult Women of 26 Years of Age and Older
NCT number
NCT00294047
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Infections, Papillomavirus, Papillomavirus Vaccines
Interventions
Cervarix, Placebo control
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Results first posted
2012-03-27

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNone stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00294047-sae