ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00322452-10088bbd

Gefitinib vs Carboplatin/Paclitaxel: Objective Tumour Response Rate According to RECIST

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Gefitinib vs Carboplatin/Paclitaxel: Objective Tumour Response Rate According to RECIST. Trial comparisons, record NCT00322452-10088bbd. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00322452-10088bbd

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.430.3910.47wilson
Risk in group 20.3220.2860.361wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.1080.05340.161newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.331.151.55log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.591.262.01log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Gefitinib than on Carboplatin/Paclitaxel9.276.218.7from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1GefitinibGefitinib 250mg daily262609OG000
Group 2Carboplatin/PaclitaxelCarboplatin AUC 5.0 or 6.0 and Paclitaxel 200 mg/m\^2 doublet chemotherapy every 3 weeks196608OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Objective Tumour Response Rate According to RECIST
Description
Number of participants with an objective response. An objective response (OR) was defined as a patient having a best overall response of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST, confirmed at least 28 days following the date of the initial response.
Time frame
Tumour assessments as per RECIST were performed at baseline and then every 42 days ± 7 days from randomization until data cut off (14th April 2008).
Population
Analysis was carried out on Intention-to-treat (ITT) population.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
First Line IRESSA™ Versus Carboplatin/Paclitaxel in Asia
NCT number
NCT00322452
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Interventions
Gefitinib, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel
Lead sponsor
AstraZeneca
Results first posted
2010-05-17

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00322452-10088bbd