ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trial comparisons

Intensive Glycemic Control vs Standard Glycemic Control: Number of Participants With at Least One Non-vertebral Fracture

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

Measures 6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNoteSource
Risk in group 10.05420.04730.062wilsonClinicalTrials.gov
Risk in group 20.0520.04530.0597wilsonClinicalTrials.gov
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.00213-0.00820.0125newcombe hybrid scoreClinicalTrials.gov
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.040.8571.26logClinicalTrials.gov
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.040.851.28logClinicalTrials.gov
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Intensive Glycemic Control than on Standard Glycemic Control468from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no differenceClinicalTrials.gov

Groups 2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov codeSource
Group 1Intensive Glycemic Control
intensive therapeutic strategy targeting normal glycated hemoglobin (A1C) levels (i.e., below 6.0%)in a population with long-standing type 2 diabetes and a history of cardiovascular disease or significant cardiovascular risk factors
1983,655OG000ClinicalTrials.gov
Group 2Standard Glycemic Controlstandard strategy targeting A1C levels from 7.0 to 7.9% in a population with long-standing type 2 diabetes and a history of cardiovascular disease or significant cardiovascular risk factors1893,632OG001ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcome 5

FieldValueSource
TypePRIMARYClinicalTrials.gov
TitleNumber of Participants With at Least One Non-vertebral FractureClinicalTrials.gov
Description
The BONE ancillary study was initiated during recruitment for the main ACCORD trial. Beginning in January 2006, at the next annual visit participants were asked about the occurrence of any non-spine fractures since randomization. After the annual visit in 2006, participants were asked if they had suffered a fracture since their last annual visit. Reported fracture events were centrally adjudicated, based on radiology records, at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) with the adjudicators blinded to treatment assignment.
ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frameAverage follow-up of 3.8 yearsClinicalTrials.gov
Population
As per protocol, pathological fractures, confirmed as occurring secondary to neoplasm, necrosis, or sepsis, and periprosthetic fractures were excluded (N=7). These analyses are limited to confirmed fractures that occurred on or before Feb 5, 2008, when the intensive glycemia intervention was ended.
ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial 8

FieldValueSource
TitleIntensive Glycemic Control and Skeletal Health StudyClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT00324350ClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesPHASE3ClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsAtherosclerosis, Cardiovascular Diseases, Hypercholesterolemia, Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Coronary DiseaseClinicalTrials.gov
Interventionshypoglycemic agents, hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase inhibitors, hypertensive agentsClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoClinicalTrials.gov
Results first posted2012-10-05ClinicalTrials.gov
Results on ClinicalTrials.govhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00324350?tab=resultsClinicalTrials.gov

Source 4

FieldValueSource
Releasetrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-256f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57ClinicalTrials.gov
AACT copy2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
Tables readoutcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquetClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.