ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00337103-fa080e62

Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2 vs Capecitabine 2.5 g/m^2/Day: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Parameter Values

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2 vs Capecitabine 2.5 g/m^2/Day: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Parameter Values. Trial comparisons, record NCT00337103-fa080e62. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00337103-fa080e62

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.6650.6250.704wilson
Risk in group 20.410.370.452wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.2550.1970.311newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.621.441.82log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 22.862.233.66log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2 than on Capecitabine 2.5 g/m^2/Day3.923.225.08from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Eribulin Mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2Eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m\^2 intravenous (IV) infusion given over 2-5 minutes on Days 1 and 8 every 21 days.362544OG000
Group 2Capecitabine 2.5 g/m^2/DayCapecitabine : Capecitabine 2.5 g/m\^2/day administered orally twice daily in two equal doses on Days 1 to 14 every 21 days.224546OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Parameter Values
Description
Time frame
First dose of study drug (Baseline) up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to approximately 6 years 3 months)
Population
Data was analyzed using safety population defined as all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
E7389 Versus Capecitabine in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With Anthracyclines and Taxanes
NCT number
NCT00337103
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Metastatic Breast Cancer
Interventions
Eribulin Mesylate, Capecitabine
Lead sponsor
Eisai Inc.
Results first posted
2013-09-30

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00337103-fa080e62