ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00353431-sae

Conventional Insulin Group vs Intensive Insulin Therapy Algorithm: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Conventional Insulin Group vs Intensive Insulin Therapy Algorithm: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00353431-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00353431-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 100.000000000000000003470.0575wilson
Risk in group 2000.0542wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20-0.05420.0575newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to harmfrom the risk difference intervalthe two groups' risks are equal

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Conventional Insulin Group
In the conventional insulin group only the meal-glucose adapted sliding scale at beginning is pre-determined. All adaptations of the insulin sliding scale remain upon the discretion of the treating physician.
063EG000
Group 2Intensive Insulin Therapy Algorithm
The algorithm in the intensive insulin group contains four insulin resistance factors, depending on baseline features of the patients and on the changes of plasma glucose levels after insulin administration. Every two to four hours the plasma glucose level is measured and Insulin aspart (Novorapid®) is injected s.c. according to the scheme. If the patient is eating, the dose of Insulin aspart (NovoRapid®)is increased according to the amount of carbohydrate intake.
067EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
48 h

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Evaluation of an Algorithm for Intensive s.c. Insulin Therapy in Emergency Room Patients With Hyperglycaemia
NCT number
NCT00353431
Phases
NA
Conditions
Hyperglycemias
Interventions
Novorapid ®, Novo Nordisk, Denmark
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Results first posted
2012-05-08

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00353431-sae