ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00361504-sae

Tapentadol (CG5503) vs Oxycodone: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Tapentadol (CG5503) vs Oxycodone: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00361504-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00361504-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.05480.04170.0717wilson
Risk in group 20.04040.02140.0749wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.0145-0.02250.0399newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.360.6772.72log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.380.6672.85log
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on Tapentadol (CG5503) than on Oxycodone69.2from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Tapentadol (CG5503)Tapentadol (CG5503) extended release (ER) 100 to 250mg twice daily (BID) for up to one year49894EG000
Group 2OxycodoneOxycodone controlled release (CR) 20 to 50mg twice daily (BID) for up to one year.9223EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Study to Evaluate Long-Term Safety of Multiple Doses of Tapentadol (CG5503) Prolonged-Release (PR) and Oxycodone Controlled-Release (CR) in Patients With Chronic Pain
NCT number
NCT00361504
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Osteoarthritis, Hip, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Lower Back Pain, Pain
Interventions
Oxycodone CR, Tapentadol (CG5503) ER
Lead sponsor
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
Results first posted
2009-09-04

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00361504-sae