Comparison · NCT00371254-4cb5715d
Dasatinib 100 mg BID vs Dasatinib 70 mg BID: Number of Participants With Identified Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Dasatinib 100 mg BID vs Dasatinib 70 mg BID: Number of Participants With Identified Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities. Trial comparisons, record NCT00371254-4cb5715d. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00371254-4cb5715d
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0.174 | 0.0698 | 0.371 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0.143 | 0.0498 | 0.346 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | 0.0311 | -0.198 | 0.249 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 1.22 | 0.308 | 4.82 | log | |
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 1.26 | 0.248 | 6.45 | log | |
| Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Dasatinib 100 mg BID than on Dasatinib 70 mg BID | 32.2 | from the risk difference interval | the interval includes no difference |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Dasatinib 100 mg BID | Participants were administered an oral dose of 100 mg dasatinib tablet twice daily for a total daily dose (TDD) of 200 mg. Study treatment continued for as long as it was tolerated, or until progressive disease (PD), defined as appearance of new lesion/s, or \>=20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, relative to the smallest sum LD recorded since treatment start, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. | 4 | 23 | OG000 |
| Group 2 | Dasatinib 70 mg BID | Participants were administered an oral dose of 70 mg dasatinib tablet twice daily for a TDD of 140 mg. Study treatment continued for as long as it was tolerated, or until PD, defined as appearance of new lesion/s, or \>=20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, relative to the smallest sum LD recorded since treatment start, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. | 3 | 21 | OG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcome
- Type
- SECONDARY
- Title
- Number of Participants With Identified Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
- Description
ECGs were performed and all recordings were evaluated by the investigator. Abnormalities, if present at any study time point, were listed. The following ECG variables were collected: heart rate, PR interval, QRS width, and QT interval. Abnormalities in ECGs were defined by reference to institutional reports.
- Time frame
- Baseline, Weeks 3, 9, 17 and 25, then every 8 weeks until the end of study treatment (up to 17 weeks).
- Population
- All treated participants
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- A Study of Dasatinib (BMS-354825) in Patients With Advanced 'Triple-negative' Breast Cancer
- NCT number
- NCT00371254
- Phases
- PHASE2
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer, Metastasis
- Interventions
- Dasatinib, Dasatinib
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Results first posted
- 2011-03-15
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00371254?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00371254-4cb5715d