Comparison · NCT00379769-ca276402
Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With an Event of Myocardial Infarction (Fatal and Non-fatal), Based on Contemporary Endpoint Definitions
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Combined RSG vs Combined MET/SU: Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With an Event of Myocardial Infarction (Fatal and Non-fatal), Based on Contemporary Endpoint Definitions. Trial comparisons, record NCT00379769-ca276402. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00379769-ca276402
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0.0324 | 0.0258 | 0.0406 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0.0278 | 0.0218 | 0.0355 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | 0.00459 | -0.00554 | 0.0148 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 1.16 | 0.834 | 1.63 | log | |
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | 1.17 | 0.829 | 1.65 | log | |
| Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Combined RSG than on Combined MET/SU | 218 | from the risk difference interval | the interval includes no difference |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Combined RSG | Participants inadequately controlled on background MET or background SU were randomised to receive RSG, in addition to MET or SU. RSG was initiated as a 4 mg once daily dose and was increased to a maximum dose of 8 mg per day as required to achieve a target HbA1c of less than or equal to 7.0 percent | 72 | 2,220 | OG000 |
| Group 2 | Combined MET/SU | Participants inadequately controlled on background MET were randomised to receive, in addition to MET, an SU (glibenclamide, gliclazide, or glimepiride). The SU was gradually increased to the maximum permitted dose (glibenclamide 15 mg per day or micronized equivalent of 10.5 mg per day; gliclazide 240 mg per day; glimepiride 4 mg per day) as required to achieve a target HbA1c of less than or equal to 7.0 percent. Participants inadequately controlled on background SU were randomised to receive, in addition to SU, MET. MET was gradually increased to the maximum permitted dose of 2550 mg per day as required to achieve a target HbA1c of less than or equal to 7.0 percent. | 62 | 2,227 | OG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcome
- Type
- PRIMARY
- Title
- Independent Re-adjudication Outcome: Number of Participants With an Event of Myocardial Infarction (Fatal and Non-fatal), Based on Contemporary Endpoint Definitions
- Description
The number of participants with an MI (fatal or non-fatal) event as determined by independent re-adjudication using the Standard Data Collection for Cardiovascular Trials Initiative (draft October 2011) endpoint definitions was recorded. An event of MI was defined as evidence of myocardial necrosis in a clinical setting consistent with myocardial ischemia.
- Time frame
- Baseline through End of Study (up to 7.5 years)
- Population
- Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants who were treated with at least one dose of study medication
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- RECORD: Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiac Outcomes and Regulation of Glycaemia in Diabetes
- NCT number
- NCT00379769
- Phases
- PHASE3
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Interventions
- Rosiglitazone, Sulfonylurea, Metformin
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Results first posted
- 2009-11-13
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00379769?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00379769-ca276402