ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00407537-sae

Caduet vs Usual Care: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Caduet vs Usual Care: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00407537-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00407537-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.06550.05010.0851wilson
Risk in group 20.03230.02140.0484wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.03320.0110.0556newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 22.031.243.31log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 22.11.263.5log
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on Caduet than on Usual Care30.11891.1from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: usual care.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1CaduetOpen label amlodipine besylate/atorvastatin calcium (Caduet) single pill combination at multiple doses: 5/10, 10/10, 5/20, 10/20 mg prescribed at the investigator's discretion.51779EG000
Group 2Usual Care
Full choice of any locally approved (and not contra indicated) anti-hypertensive and/or lipid lowering drugs, including, but not limited to amlodipine and atorvastatin, according to local clinical practice.
22682EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Caduet vs Usual Care in Subjects With Hypertension and Additional Risk Factors
NCT number
NCT00407537
Phases
PHASE4
Conditions
Hypertension, Hypercholesterolemia
Interventions
Amlodipine besylate/atorvastatin calcium single pill combination
Lead sponsor
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
Results first posted
2011-11-11

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00407537-sae