ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00424515-sae

Amplified KIT vs Mutated KIT: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Amplified KIT vs Mutated KIT: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00424515-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00424515-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.09090.01620.377wilson
Risk in group 20.2310.08180.503wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.14-0.4220.183newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.3940.04753.27log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.3330.02943.77log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with a serious adverse event on Amplified KIT than on Mutated KIT7.15from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Amplified KIT
Imatinib was given at a dose of 400 mg orally daily (4 100 mg pills). Patients received treatment up to 12 months as long as they were receiving clinical benefit. Dosage may have been increased to twice daily if disease worsened and patient was in otherwise good clinical condition. Patients were classified into two cohorts based upon KIT molecular status.
111EG000
Group 2Mutated KIT
Imatinib was given at a dose of 400 mg orally daily (4 100 mg pills). Patients received treatment up to 12 months as long as they were receiving clinical benefit. Dosage may have been increased to twice daily if disease worsened and patient was in otherwise good clinical condition. Patients were classified into two cohorts based upon KIT molecular status.
313EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
AE assessment occurred every other month from the start of study drug and up to day 30 post-treatment.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Imatinib in Patients With Mucosal or Acral/Lentiginous Melanoma
NCT number
NCT00424515
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
Mucosal Melanoma, Acral/Lentiginous Melanoma, Chronically Sun Damaged Melanomas
Interventions
Imatinib
Lead sponsor
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Results first posted
2016-12-08

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00424515-sae