ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00430781-2349cbcc

Lapatinib Monotherapy vs Pazopanib Monotherapy: Clinical Benefit Response

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Lapatinib Monotherapy vs Pazopanib Monotherapy: Clinical Benefit Response. Trial comparisons, record NCT00430781-2349cbcc. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00430781-2349cbcc

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.08970.04420.174wilson
Risk in group 20.2030.1270.308wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.113-0.2280.000284newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.4430.1911.02log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.3880.1481.01log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Lapatinib Monotherapy than on Pazopanib Monotherapy8.85from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Lapatinib Monotherapy1500 mg (6 x 250 mg tablets) of oral lapatinib daily778OG000
Group 2Pazopanib Monotherapy800 mg (2 x 400 mg tablets) of oral pazopanib daily1574OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Clinical Benefit Response
Description
Clinical benefit response is defined as the number of participants with evidence of complete (CR) or partial (PR) tumor response or stable disease (SD) for at least 6 months (183 days). Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST): CR, all detectable tumor has disappeared; PR, a \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum; Stable Disease, small changes that do not meet previously given criteria. Confirmation requires at least 2 assessments of CR/PR with at least 4 weeks between assessments.
Time frame
From Randomization until 105 total PFS events in combined population of two monotherapy arms (up to 85.57 weeks)
Population
ITT Population

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Pazopanib Plus Lapatinib Compared to Lapatinib Alone and Pazopanib Alone In Subjects With Metastatic Cervical Cancer
NCT number
NCT00430781
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
Neoplasms, Uterine Cervix, Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Interventions
pazopanib (GW786034), lapatinib (GW572016)
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Results first posted
2011-03-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00430781-2349cbcc