Comparison · NCT00441792-sae
Midazolam vs Etomidate: serious adverse events
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Midazolam vs Etomidate: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00441792-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00441792-sae
On this page
Measures6
Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.
| Measure | Value | 95% interval, lower | 95% interval, upper | Method | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk in group 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0611 | wilson | |
| Risk in group 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.0592 | wilson | |
| Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2 | 0 | -0.0592 | 0.0611 | newcombe hybrid score | |
| Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2 | log | a group has no participants with the outcome | |||
| Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2 | log | a cell of the two-by-two table is zero | |||
| Number needed to harm | from the risk difference interval | the two groups' risks are equal |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Groups2
Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.
| Group | Title | Description | With the outcome | Analysed | ClinicalTrials.gov code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Midazolam | Patients received either etomidate or midazolam. | 0 | 59 | EG000 |
| Group 2 | Etomidate | Patients received either etomidate (0.3 mg/kg) or midazolam (0.1 mg/kg) intravenously before rapid sequence intubation in a double-blind fashion. The dose of each medication was chosen according to current physician practice and previous study findings. Identical study vials containing either etomidate or midazolam, in volume-equivalent concentrations, were prepared by our pharmacy department and stored in kits that also contained a variety of commonly used paralytic agents. Kits were labeled with numbers that reflected the assignment generated by a randomization sequence generator and placed in our automated medication dispensing cabinet (Omnicell, Inc., Mountain View, CA). The remainder of the patients' care, both in the ED and in the ICU, was directed according to the treating physician. | 0 | 61 | EG001 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Harm
- What it counts
- Total, serious adverse events
- Time frame
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial
- Title
- The Effect of Etomidate on Patient Outcomes After Single Bolus Doses
- NCT number
- NCT00441792
- Phases
- NA
- Conditions
- Sepsis, Trauma
- Interventions
- Etomidate, midazolam
- Lead sponsor
- Advocate Hospital System
- Results first posted
- 2012-04-06
- Results on ClinicalTrials.gov
- https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00441792?tab=results
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Source
- Release
- trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
- Release manifest SHA-256
- f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
- AACT copy
- 2026-03-23
- Tables read
- outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Sources 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.
For software
Read this comparison from software.
The record is JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00441792-sae