ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00445263-a3f33934

Early Invasive Strategy vs Delayed Invasive Strategy: Mortality, Myocardial Infarction and Revascularization in Emergency

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Early Invasive Strategy vs Delayed Invasive Strategy: Mortality, Myocardial Infarction and Revascularization in Emergency. Trial comparisons, record NCT00445263-a3f33934. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00445263-a3f33934

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.02410.006630.0837wilson
Risk in group 20.2440.1660.345wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.22-0.322-0.121newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.09870.02390.408log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.07640.01730.338log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Early Invasive Strategy than on Delayed Invasive Strategy4.543.118.23from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Early Invasive StrategyTirofiban and coronarography within six hours283OG000
Group 2Delayed Invasive StrategyCoronarography after six hours2186OG001

Outcome

Type
PRIMARY
Title
Mortality, Myocardial Infarction and Revascularization in Emergency
Description
Time frame
d30
Population

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Comparison of Two Treatment Strategies in Patients With an Acute Coronary Syndrome Without ST Elevation
NCT number
NCT00445263
Phases
PHASE4
Conditions
CORONARY DISEASE
Interventions
TIROFIBAN, CORONAROGRAPHY
Lead sponsor
Hospital Avicenne
Results first posted
2015-02-09

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00445263-a3f33934