ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00457015-69bf014a

KALBITOR (Ecallantide) vs Placebo: Patients With Significant Improvement in Overall Response

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. KALBITOR (Ecallantide) vs Placebo: Patients With Significant Improvement in Overall Response. Trial comparisons, record NCT00457015-69bf014a. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00457015-69bf014a

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.4580.3260.597wilson
Risk in group 20.250.1490.388wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.2080.01710.38newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.831.033.27log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 22.541.076.03log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on KALBITOR (Ecallantide) than on Placebo4.82.6358.6from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: placebo.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1KALBITOR (Ecallantide)KALBITOR (ecallantide, DX-88) 30 mg given as three 10 mg/mL subcutaneous injections.2248OG000
Group 2PlaceboPlacebo, Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS), pH 7.0 given as 3 subcutaneous injections.1248OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Patients With Significant Improvement in Overall Response
Description
Patients were to be asked to perform an overall response assessment at intervals during the first 4 hours post-dose. Assessments were to be made relative to baseline (ie, immediately before initial dosing) using a 5-category scale. Categories were: significant improvement = a lot better or resolved; improvement = a little better; same = response unchanged; worsening = a little worse; significant worsening = a lot worse. Significant improvement is the first time that a patient responded to the overall response assessment as a lot better or resolved.
Time frame
4 hours post-dose
Population
The time to significant improvement is not provided in this display as the estimated median times were not reached by 240 minutes. Instead, the number of patients with significant improvement is provided per treatment arm.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Efficacy Study of DX-88 (Ecallantide) to Treat Acute Attacks of Hereditary Angioedema (HAE)
NCT number
NCT00457015
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Hereditary Angioedema (HAE)
Interventions
ecallantide, Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS), pH 7.0
Lead sponsor
Shire
Results first posted
2010-05-04

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00457015-69bf014a