ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00458393-12798496

TDF/FTC vs Placebo: Grade 3 or Higher Phosphorous Toxicity

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. TDF/FTC vs Placebo: Grade 3 or Higher Phosphorous Toxicity. Trial comparisons, record NCT00458393-12798496. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00458393-12798496

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.01060.006210.0181wilson
Risk in group 20.008160.004440.0149wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.00246-0.005640.0108newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.30.5732.96log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.30.572.99log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on TDF/FTC than on Placebo407from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: placebo.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1TDF/FTCDaily oral emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate131,225OG000
Group 2PlaceboDaily oral placebo101,226OG001

Outcome

Type
PRIMARY
Title
Grade 3 or Higher Phosphorous Toxicity
Description
Grade 3 or higher phosphorous toxicity (hypophosphatemia) by the Division of AIDS Grading Table (severe, level at or below 1.9 mg/dL)
Time frame
The entire follow-up period, median 1.2 years
Population
All participants with at least 1 follow-up phosphorus value

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate for HIV Prevention in Men
NCT number
NCT00458393
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
HIV Infections
Interventions
daily TDF/FTC, Placebo
Lead sponsor
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Results first posted
2018-01-24

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00458393-12798496