ConductScience.org, home

Library / Trial comparisons

LNG IUS vs Copper IUD: Contraceptive Failure

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

Measures 6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNoteSource
Risk in group 10.0006040.0004120.000884wilsonClinicalTrials.gov
Risk in group 20.005010.004090.00614wilsonClinicalTrials.gov
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0044-0.00555-0.00344newcombe hybrid scoreClinicalTrials.gov
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.1210.0780.186logClinicalTrials.gov
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.120.07760.185logClinicalTrials.gov
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on LNG IUS than on Copper IUD227180291from the risk difference intervalClinicalTrials.gov

Groups 2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov codeSource
Group 1LNG IUSNew users of Mirena® IUS2643,078OG000ClinicalTrials.gov
Group 2Copper IUDNew users of Copper IUD9218,370OG001ClinicalTrials.gov

Outcome 5

FieldValueSource
TypeOTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDClinicalTrials.gov
TitleContraceptive FailureClinicalTrials.gov
Description
Intrauterine contraceptive methods have low Pearl Indices. Nevertheless, there is a lack of comparative data between LNG IUS users and copper IUD users. Women with unintended pregnancies were explicitly aked whether the pregnancy occured despite IUD use. The 29 pregnancies that occured after unrecognized IUD expulsion were considered to have resulted from a failure of the contraceptive method and were therefore included in the analysis.
ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frameWithin 12 monthsClinicalTrials.gov
PopulationClinicalTrials.gov

Trial 8

FieldValueSource
TitleEuropean Active Surveillance Study for Intrauterine DevicesClinicalTrials.gov
NCT numberNCT00461175ClinicalTrials.gov
PhasesClinicalTrials.gov
ConditionsUterine PerforationClinicalTrials.gov
InterventionsClinicalTrials.gov
Lead sponsorCenter for Epidemiology and Health Research, GermanyClinicalTrials.gov
Results first posted2014-10-22ClinicalTrials.gov
Results on ClinicalTrials.govhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00461175?tab=resultsClinicalTrials.gov

Source 4

FieldValueSource
Releasetrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0ClinicalTrials.gov
Release manifest SHA-256f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57ClinicalTrials.gov
AACT copy2026-03-23ClinicalTrials.gov
Tables readoutcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquetClinicalTrials.gov

The same record as JSON

Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACT: ClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299 ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

ClinicalTrials.gov: none stated ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.