ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00487162-sae

Conventional Glycemic Control vs Intensive Glycemic Control: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Conventional Glycemic Control vs Intensive Glycemic Control: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00487162-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00487162-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 100.00000000000000001390.121wilson
Risk in group 2000.155wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20-0.1550.121newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to harmfrom the risk difference intervalthe two groups' risks are equal

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Conventional Glycemic Control
Subjects randomized to this study arm had their glucose levels monitored hourly and if the result was greater than 200mg/dL their anesthesia care provider was notified. The subject was treated as to their care provider discretion.
028EG000
Group 2Intensive Glycemic ControlSubjects randomized to this group had glucose levels monitored hourly and when \>110mg/dL an insulin drip was initiated to maintain glucose levels between 80-110021EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
The Association Between Peri-Operative Hyperglycemia and Major Morbidity and Mortality
NCT number
NCT00487162
Phases
NA
Conditions
Hyperglycemia
Interventions
intensive glycemic control, conventional glycemic control
Lead sponsor
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey
Results first posted
2014-04-03

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00487162-sae