ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00513305-sae

Low-dose Cytarabine Plus Arsenic Trioxide vs Low-dose Cytarabine Alone: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Low-dose Cytarabine Plus Arsenic Trioxide vs Low-dose Cytarabine Alone: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00513305-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00513305-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.5760.4080.728wilson
Risk in group 20.6360.4660.778wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0606-0.280.168newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.9050.6121.34log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.7760.2882.09log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with a serious adverse event on Low-dose Cytarabine Plus Arsenic Trioxide than on Low-dose Cytarabine Alone16.5from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Low-dose Cytarabine Plus Arsenic Trioxide
Cycle 1. 10 mg/m\^2 cytarabine was administered subcutaneously (sc) twice daily (bid) on days 1-14. 0.25 mg/kg arsenic trioxide was administered intravenously (iv) on days 1-5 and days 8-12. Cycle 2. A second identical cycle of cytarabine and arsenic trioxide was given to patients with persistent disease identified from a bone marrow sample taken on day 21 of cycle 1. Patients who achieved complete remission (CR), complete remission with incomplete platelet count recovery (CRp), or partial remission (PR) after 1 or 2 cycles received a 14-day consolidation cycle of cytarabine and arsenic trioxide with the doses and schedule identical to the initial cycle. A recovery period of up to 4 weeks between the attainment of CR, CRp, or PR and the initiation of consolidation treatment was allowed. Patients who completed consolidation treatment started maintenance treatment of arsenic trioxide 0.25 mg/kg iv on days 1 and 4 and cytarabine 10 mg/m\^2 sc bid on days 1 through 7 of a 28-day cycle.
1933EG000
Group 2Low-dose Cytarabine Alone
Cytarabine was administered at a dose of 10 mg/m\^2 sc bid from days 1-14 of cycle 1. A second identical cycle of cytarabine treatment was given to patients with persistent disease identified from a bone marrow sample taken on day 21 of cycle 1. Patients who achieved a complete remission (CR), complete remission with incomplete platelet count recovery (CRp), or partial remission (PR) after 1 or 2 cycles received a 14-day consolidation cycle of cytarabine with the doses and schedule identical to the initial treatment cycle. A recovery period of up to 4 weeks between the attainment of CR, CRp, or PR and the initiation of consolidation treatment was allowed. Patients who completed consolidation treatment started maintenance treatment of cytarabine at 10 mg/m\^2 sc bid on days 1-7 of a 28-day cycle. Patients started maintenance treatment within 42 days after platelet count recovery. Maintenance treatment continued for 2 years or until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression.
2133EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
approximately 2 years

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Cytarabine in Combination With Arsenic Trioxide vs. Cytarabine Alone in Elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT number
NCT00513305
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Interventions
Arsenic trioxide, Low-dose cytarabine alone
Lead sponsor
Cephalon
Results first posted
2011-03-29

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00513305-sae