ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00523341-b7aed1a7

Denosumab / Denosumab vs Placebo / Denosumab: Number of Participants With Non-Vertebral Fractures

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Denosumab / Denosumab vs Placebo / Denosumab: Number of Participants With Non-Vertebral Fractures. Trial comparisons, record NCT00523341-b7aed1a7. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00523341-b7aed1a7

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.07340.06350.0847wilson
Risk in group 20.09920.08740.112wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0258-0.0423-0.00951newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.740.6110.896log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.7190.5840.886log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Denosumab / Denosumab than on Placebo / Denosumab38.723.6105from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: placebo.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Denosumab / Denosumab
Participants who were randomized to denosumab in the core study received a 60 mg subcutaneous injection of denosumab every 6 months for up to seven years in the extension study (total of 10 years treatment).
1722,343OG001
Group 2Placebo / DenosumabParticipants who were randomized to placebo in the core study received a 60 mg subcutaneous injection of denosumab every 6 months for up to seven years in the extension study.2192,207OG000

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Number of Participants With Non-Vertebral Fractures
Description
Non-vertebral fractures (osteoporotic) were defined as a fracture present on a copy of radiographs or other diagnostic images such as computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirming the fracture, and/or documented in a copy of the radiology report, surgical report, or discharge summary, excluding skull, facial, mandible, cervical vertebrae, thoracic vertebrae, lumbar vertebrae, metacarpus, finger phalanges, and toe phalanges. In addition, fractures associated with high trauma severity or pathologic fractures were excluded.
Time frame
84 months
Population
All enrolled participants

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Extension Study to Evaluate the Long Term Safety and Efficacy of Denosumab in the Treatment of Osteoporosis
NCT number
NCT00523341
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Osteopenia, Osteoporosis
Interventions
Denosumab
Lead sponsor
Amgen
Results first posted
2016-07-12

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00523341-b7aed1a7