ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00539539-6320aad7

Feedback On vs Feedback Off: Survival to Hospital Discharge

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Feedback On vs Feedback Off: Survival to Hospital Discharge. Trial comparisons, record NCT00539539-6320aad7. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00539539-6320aad7

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.1130.09290.136wilson
Risk in group 20.1250.1030.15wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0116-0.04370.0202newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.9070.6931.19log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.8950.661.21log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Feedback On than on Feedback Off86from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Feedback OnAutomated real-time feedback on CPR Process activated92815OG000
Group 2Feedback Off
For the first three to six months, participating EMS agencies will have defibrillators with automated, real-time feedback inactivated. During this period, the baseline rate of ROSC (and secondary outcomes) will be collected. At the end of this baseline period, EMS agencies will be randomized to one of two interventions, with randomization stratified within site by agency, station, or device. All clusters will cross-over to the opposite feedback strategy at least once during the intervention phase.
96771OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Survival to Hospital Discharge
Description
Survival to hospital discharge
Time frame
Length of Hospitalization
Population
Intention to treat, with survival to hospital discharge missing for one participant on the feedback off arm. Analysis included 815 participants on the feedback on arm, and 770 on the feedback off arm.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Automated Real-time Feedback on CPR Study
NCT number
NCT00539539
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
Heart Arrest
Interventions
Laerdal Q-CPR /technology
Lead sponsor
University of Washington
Results first posted
2012-06-25

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00539539-6320aad7