ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00539539-ffc34b3e

Feedback On vs Feedback Off: Pulses Present at ED Arrival.

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Feedback On vs Feedback Off: Pulses Present at ED Arrival. Trial comparisons, record NCT00539539-ffc34b3e. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00539539-ffc34b3e

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.3190.2880.352wilson
Risk in group 20.3150.2830.349wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.00384-0.0420.0495newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.010.8761.17log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.020.8241.26log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Feedback On than on Feedback Off260from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Feedback OnAutomated real-time feedback on CPR Process activated260815OG000
Group 2Feedback Off
For the first three to six months, participating EMS agencies will have defibrillators with automated, real-time feedback inactivated. During this period, the baseline rate of ROSC (and secondary outcomes) will be collected. At the end of this baseline period, EMS agencies will be randomized to one of two interventions, with randomization stratified within site by agency, station, or device. All clusters will cross-over to the opposite feedback strategy at least once during the intervention phase.
243771OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Pulses Present at ED Arrival.
Description
Time frame
Resuscitation
Population
Intention to treat. Presence of pulses not known for one participant on the feedback off arm. Analysis includes 815 participants on the feedback on arm and 770 on the feedback off arm.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Automated Real-time Feedback on CPR Study
NCT number
NCT00539539
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
Heart Arrest
Interventions
Laerdal Q-CPR /technology
Lead sponsor
University of Washington
Results first posted
2012-06-25

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00539539-ffc34b3e