ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00551174-sae

2 mg Ibandronate q2mo vs 3 mg Ibandronate q3mo: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. 2 mg Ibandronate q2mo vs 3 mg Ibandronate q3mo: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00551174-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00551174-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.2360.1960.281wilson
Risk in group 20.210.1730.253wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.0262-0.03210.0846newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.120.8651.46log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.160.831.63log
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on 2 mg Ibandronate q2mo than on 3 mg Ibandronate q3mo38.1from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 12 mg Ibandronate q2mo2 mg ibandronate intravenously (IV) every 2 months (q2mo) for 3 years90381EG000
Group 23 mg Ibandronate q3mo3 mg ibandronate intravenously (IV) every 3 months (q3mo) for 3 years84400EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Study of Bonviva (Ibandronate) in Women With Post-Menopausal Osteoporosis Who Have Received Previous Bonviva Treatment
NCT number
NCT00551174
Phases
PHASE4
Conditions
Post-Menopausal Osteoporosis
Interventions
ibandronate [Bonviva/Boniva], ibandronate [Bonviva/Boniva]
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Results first posted
2011-05-30

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00551174-sae