ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00573131-sae

Group 1 vs Group 2: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Group 1 vs Group 2: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00573131-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00573131-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.4170.310.532wilson
Risk in group 20.3080.2090.428wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.109-0.05190.261newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.350.8592.14log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.610.7943.25log
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on Group 1 than on Group 29.18from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Group 1OncoGel, radiation therapy and systemic chemotherapy (cisplatin plus 5-FU) prior to surgical resection.3072EG000
Group 2Group 2Radiation therapy and systemic chemotherapy (cisplatin plus 5-FU) prior to surgical resection.2065EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
Adverse events were collected through the 12 week Assessment Period

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Efficacy and Safety of OncoGel™ Added to Chemotherapy and Radiation Before Surgery in Subjects With Esophageal Cancer
NCT number
NCT00573131
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
Esophageal Cancer, Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus, Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Interventions
OncoGel (Paclitaxel gel), cisplatin, 5-FU, radiation therapy, esophageal resection
Lead sponsor
Boston Scientific Corporation
Results first posted
2014-05-16

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00573131-sae