ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00597116-867520ab

Vandetanib vs Vinorelbine: Number of Participants With Objective Response.

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Vandetanib vs Vinorelbine: Number of Participants With Objective Response. Trial comparisons, record NCT00597116-867520ab. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00597116-867520ab

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 100.00000000000000002780.242wilson
Risk in group 2000.278wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20-0.2780.242newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 2loga group has no participants with the outcome
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 2loga cell of the two-by-two table is zero
Number needed to treatfrom the risk difference intervalthe two groups' risks are equal

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1VandetanibVandetanib 300 mg/day oral012OG000
Group 2VinorelbineVinorelbine 30 mg/m2 iv, administrated weekly010OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Number of Participants With Objective Response.
Description
Objective response is defined as having a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR) according to the modified RECIST criteria for assessment of response in malignant pleural mesothelioma. CR is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions with no evidence of tumour elsewhere and PR is defined as at least a 30% reduction in the total tumour measurement. A confirmed response requires a repeat observation on two occasions 4 weeks apart.
Time frame
Assessed at 2 months.
Population
Only patients in the evaluable for efficacy population were included. It was defined as all treated patients with no major deviations from the eligibility criteria affecting the evaluation of efficacy, who completed at least 2 cycles (unless progressive disease occurred at cycle 1) and who had at least one post-treatment tumour assessment.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
An Efficacy and Safety Study With Vandetanib to Treat Inoperable or Relapsed Malignant Mesothelioma
NCT number
NCT00597116
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
Mesothelioma
Interventions
Vinorelbine, Vandetanib
Lead sponsor
Genzyme, a Sanofi Company
Results first posted
2012-10-15

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00597116-867520ab