ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00632411-sae

Proactive Group vs Reactive Group: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Proactive Group vs Reactive Group: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00632411-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00632411-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.02470.01520.0397wilson
Risk in group 20.009240.004240.02wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.01540.001090.0312newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 22.671.056.77log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 22.711.056.97log
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on Proactive Group than on Reactive Group64.932915from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Proactive GroupStudy staff will initiate contact to conduct 6 individual counseling sessions.~Participants will receive 8 weeks of Nicotine Replacement Therapy in the form of a patch.16649EG000
Group 2Reactive GroupParticipant will initiate contact with participant to conduct 6 individual counseling sessions.~Participants will receive 2 weeks of Nicotine Replacement Therapy in the form of a patch.6649EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
1 year

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Evaluating a Telephone-Based Smoking Cessation Program Among People in the Military (The AFIII Study)
NCT number
NCT00632411
Phases
NA
Conditions
Smoking, Smoking Cessation
Interventions
Nicotine Patch, Tobacco Quit Line Program
Lead sponsor
University of Tennessee
Results first posted
2017-05-24

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00632411-sae