ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00634920-sae

Everolimus (CNI-free) vs Control (CsA): serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Everolimus (CNI-free) vs Control (CsA): serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00634920-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00634920-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.7060.6110.786wilson
Risk in group 20.650.5530.736wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.0559-0.07220.182newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.090.8971.31log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.290.7152.34log
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on Everolimus (CNI-free) than on Control (CsA)17.9from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: control.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Everolimus (CNI-free)
This investigational drug was provided by Novartis. All patients received induction therapy with basiliximab, and commenced on an immunosuppressive regimen consisting of CsA, EC-MPS and corticosteroids before they were randomized. After randomization patients in the everolimus group (CNI-free regimen) were treated with everolimus (Certican) EC MPS and corticosteroids. Patients randomized to this arm 7 weeks after renal transplantation will do an overnight switch from cyclosporine to everolimus.
72102EG001
Group 2Control (CsA)
All patients received induction therapy with basiliximab, and commenced on an immunosuppressive regimen consisting of CsA, EC-MPS and corticosteroids before they were randomized. After randomization patients in the control group continued on the prior immunosuppressive regimen given before randomization. Conventional treatment arm with cyclosporine (CsA), mycophenolate (Myfortic) and corticosteroids continued for the entire 36 months study period.
65100EG000

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Evaluation of Early Conversion to Everolimus From Cyclosporine in de Novo Renal Transplant Recipients
NCT number
NCT00634920
Phases
PHASE4
Conditions
Renal Function
Interventions
everolimus, cyclosporine A, Enteric Coated Mycophenolate Sodium (EC-MPS), corticosteroids, Basiliximab
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Results first posted
2014-08-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00634920-sae