ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00645099-a8ed374e

Paliperidone ER vs Olanzapine: Number of Patients With Impaired Fasting Glucose

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Paliperidone ER vs Olanzapine: Number of Patients With Impaired Fasting Glucose. Trial comparisons, record NCT00645099-a8ed374e. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00645099-a8ed374e

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.3050.2480.368wilson
Risk in group 20.3250.2640.392wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0202-0.1080.0675newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.9380.7091.24log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.9110.6051.37log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on Paliperidone ER than on Olanzapine49.5from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Paliperidone ER6-mg or 9-mg tablet once daily flexible dosing for 6 months68223OG000
Group 2Olanzapine10-15 mg (using 5-mg or 10-mg tablets) once daily flexible dosing for 6 months66203OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Number of Patients With Impaired Fasting Glucose
Description
Post-baseline glucose level under fasted conditions ≥100 mg/dL but \<126 mg/dL.
Time frame
Baseline to End Point (up to 6 months)
Population
The secondary end point analysis set included all patients who received study medication at least once and provided ≥1 post-baseline efficacy measurement. Therefore, the total number of patients in the analysis set depends on the number of patients having post-baseline data for the particular secondary efficacy parameter under discussion.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A 6 Month Study to Compare the Metabolic Effects of Paliperidone ER and Olanzapine in Patients With Schizophrenia
NCT number
NCT00645099
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Schizophrenia
Interventions
olanzapine, paliperidone ER
Lead sponsor
Janssen-Cilag International NV
Results first posted
2010-07-29

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00645099-a8ed374e