ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00645671-sae

Loteprednol Etabonate vs Vehicle: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Loteprednol Etabonate vs Vehicle: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00645671-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00645671-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.01490.005090.043wilson
Risk in group 20.01010.002760.0359wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.00488-0.02280.0338newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.490.2518.79log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.490.2479.03log
Number needed to harm, for one more participant with a serious adverse event on Loteprednol Etabonate than on Vehicle205from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: vehicle.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Loteprednol EtabonateLoteprednol etabonate 0.5% ophthalmic ointment3201EG000
Group 2VehicleVehicle of loteprednol etabonate ointment2199EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
The LE treatment group had a mean exposure of 13.2 days (+/-3.06), the vehicle treatment group mean exposure was 9.2 days (+/-5.10). Mean days of exposure was < 14 days due to the use of rescue medication, especially in the vehicle group.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Loteprednol Etabonate Ophthalmic Ointment vs. Vehicle in the Treatment of Inflammation Following Cataract Surgery
NCT number
NCT00645671
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Ocular Inflammation
Interventions
0.5% Loteprednol Etabonate Ophthalmic Ointment, Vehicle of Loteprednol Etabonate Ophthalmic Ointment
Lead sponsor
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Results first posted
2010-09-23

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00645671-sae