ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00650585-50cf66a6

Treatment Group vs Control Group: Self-reported 30-day Use of Alcohol

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Treatment Group vs Control Group: Self-reported 30-day Use of Alcohol. Trial comparisons, record NCT00650585-50cf66a6. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00650585-50cf66a6

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.1430.1290.158wilson
Risk in group 20.140.1270.155wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.00291-0.01710.0229newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.020.8861.18log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 21.020.8691.21log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Treatment Group than on Control Group344from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: control.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Treatment GroupSchool received Project ALERT, a substance use prevention program with 11 lessons the first year and 3 booster lessons the second year3322,324OG001
Group 2Control GroupSchool did not receive Project ALERT, a substance use prevention program3302,358OG000

Outcome

Type
PRIMARY
Title
Self-reported 30-day Use of Alcohol
Description
Students completed an 81-item self-report questionnaire. They were asked on how many days they had used alcohol in the previous 30 days. Response options included none, 1 or 2 days in the last month, 3 to 5 days in the last month, 6 to 19 days in the last month, and 20 or more days in the last month. Response options were dichotomized into none and at least one day.
Time frame
measured approximately 30 days after intervention completed
Population
Data were cleaned to remove cases with logical inconsistencies which decreased our sample by 3.6% of respondents at pretest and 7.5% at post-test. Missing covariate data were imputed using the Expectation Maximization (EM) algorithm. Missing data were imputed using the EM algorithms implemented in the Missing Value Analysis module in SPSS 13.0.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
An Effectiveness Trial of Project ALERT
NCT number
NCT00650585
Phases
NA
Conditions
Alcohol Drinking, Smoking, Marijuana Smoking
Interventions
Project ALERT
Lead sponsor
Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation
Results first posted
2009-10-21

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00650585-50cf66a6