ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00690378-aef90f2f

NXL104/CAZ vs Imipenem Cilastatin: Microbiological Outcome in ME Patients at the LFU Visit

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. NXL104/CAZ vs Imipenem Cilastatin: Microbiological Outcome in ME Patients at the LFU Visit. Trial comparisons, record NCT00690378-aef90f2f. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00690378-aef90f2f

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.5770.3890.745wilson
Risk in group 20.60.4230.754wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0231-0.2660.221newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.9620.6191.49log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.9090.3132.64log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with the outcome on NXL104/CAZ than on Imipenem Cilastatin43.3from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1NXL104/CAZNXL104 125mg/Ceftazidime 500mg TID1526OG000
Group 2Imipenem CilastatinImipenem cilastatin 500mg 4xdaily1830OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Microbiological Outcome in ME Patients at the LFU Visit
Description
Sustained eradication: a uropathogen found at entry at \>10\^5 CFU/mL remained \<10\^4 CFU/mL
Time frame
4 to 6 weeks post-therapy
Population

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Comparative Study of NXL104/Ceftazidime Versus Comparator in Adults With Complicated Urinary Tract Infections
NCT number
NCT00690378
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
Complicated Urinary Tract Infection
Interventions
NXL104/ceftazidime, Imipenem/Cilastatin
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Results first posted
2018-05-25

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00690378-aef90f2f