ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00699153-6bd6966a

Loteprednol Etabonate vs Vehicle: Participants With Grade 0 (no) Pain

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Loteprednol Etabonate vs Vehicle: Participants With Grade 0 (no) Pain. Trial comparisons, record NCT00699153-6bd6966a. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00699153-6bd6966a

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.7340.6690.79wilson
Risk in group 20.4110.3450.48wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.3230.2290.409newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 21.791.492.15log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 23.962.66.01log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Loteprednol Etabonate than on Vehicle3.12.444.37from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Group 2 names the comparator: vehicle.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Loteprednol EtabonateLoteprednol Etabonate Ophthalmic Ointment 0.5%149203OG000
Group 2VehicleVehicle of Ophthalmic Loteprednol Etabonate83202OG001

Outcome

Type
PRIMARY
Title
Participants With Grade 0 (no) Pain
Description
Pain: A positive sensation of the eye, including foreign body sensation, stabbing, throbbing, or aching. Grade 0 = None; 1=Minimal; 2=Mild; 3=Moderate; 4=Moderately Severe; 5=Severe
Time frame
Postoperative day 8 (Visit 5)
Population
Intent to treat population

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Loteprednol Etabonate in an Ophthalmic Base vs Vehicle for the Treatment of Inflammation Following Cataract Surgery
NCT number
NCT00699153
Phases
PHASE3
Conditions
Ocular Inflammation
Interventions
Loteprednol Etabonate, Vehicle of Ophthalmic Loteprednol Etabonate
Lead sponsor
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Results first posted
2010-09-23

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00699153-6bd6966a