ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00717041-e320f201

Depressed in the ED vs Cognitively Impaired in the ED: Depression and Cognitive Impairment at 2 Weeks

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Depressed in the ED vs Cognitively Impaired in the ED: Depression and Cognitive Impairment at 2 Weeks. Trial comparisons, record NCT00717041-e320f201. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00717041-e320f201

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.03360.02320.0485wilson
Risk in group 20.006190.002650.0144wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.02740.01420.0427newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 25.432.114log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 25.592.1414.6log
Number needed to treat, for one more participant with the outcome on Depressed in the ED than on Cognitively Impaired in the ED36.423.470.6from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Depressed in the EDPatients who present to the ED who test positive for depression27803OG000
Group 2Cognitively Impaired in the EDPatients presenting to the ED who have cognitive impairment5808OG001

Outcome

Type
SECONDARY
Title
Depression and Cognitive Impairment at 2 Weeks
Description
For the individuals who are able to be contacted in 2 weeks, how many still test positive for depression and cognitive impairment.
Time frame
2 weeks
Population

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
Epidemiology of Depression, Anxiety, and Cognitive Impairment
NCT number
NCT00717041
Phases
Conditions
Depression, Anxiety, Cognitive Impairment
Interventions
Lead sponsor
University of Rochester
Results first posted
2015-06-15

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00717041-e320f201