ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00726323-deaths

Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen vs Daily Dosing Regimen: deaths from any cause

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen vs Daily Dosing Regimen: deaths from any cause. Trial comparisons, record NCT00726323-deaths. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00726323-deaths

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.3780.2410.539wilson
Risk in group 20.1620.07650.311wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 20.2160.01320.398newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 22.331.015.41log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 23.141.059.43log
Number needed to harm, for one more death from any cause on Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen than on Daily Dosing Regimen4.632.5176from the risk difference interval

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen
Eligible participants received oral foretinib bisphosphate 240 mg on Days 1 to 5 of every 14-day cycle. Participants continued this schedule for 8 weeks. The treatment drug was supposed to be stopped any time in case of disease progression. All participants were followed-up every 8 weeks for tumor assessment, while the participant remained in the treatment extension period.
1437EG000
Group 2Daily Dosing Regimen
Eligible participants received oral foretinib bisphosphate 80 mg daily of every 14-day cycle. Participants continued this schedule for 8 weeks. treatment drug was supposed to be stopped any time in case of disease progression. All participants were followed-up every 8 weeks for tumor assessment, while the participant remained in the treatment extension period.
637EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, all-cause mortality
Time frame
Approximately up to 48 months

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Phase II Study of GSK1363089 (Formerly XL880) for Papillary Renal-Cell Carcinoma (PRC)
NCT number
NCT00726323
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
Interventions
foretinib (formerly GSK1363089 or XL880)
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Results first posted
2017-12-11

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00726323-deaths