ConductScience.org, home

Comparison · NCT00726323-sae

Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen vs Daily Dosing Regimen: serious adverse events

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

2 sourcestrial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen vs Daily Dosing Regimen: serious adverse events. Trial comparisons, record NCT00726323-sae. Release trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0, 23 Mar 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/comparisons/NCT00726323-sae

On this page

Measures6

Calculated by ConductScience from the counts the trial posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

MeasureValue95% interval, lower95% interval, upperMethodNote
Risk in group 10.5410.3840.69wilson
Risk in group 20.5950.4350.737wilson
Risk difference, group 1 minus group 2-0.0541-0.2650.164newcombe hybrid score
Risk ratio, group 1 over group 20.9090.611.35log
Odds ratio, group 1 over group 20.8020.3192.02log
Number needed to treat, for one fewer participant with a serious adverse event on Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen than on Daily Dosing Regimen18.5from the risk difference intervalthe interval includes no difference

Groups2

Neither group, or both, names a comparator, so the groups keep ClinicalTrials.gov's order.

GroupTitleDescriptionWith the outcomeAnalysedClinicalTrials.gov code
Group 1Intermittent 5 & 9 Dosing Regimen
Eligible participants received oral foretinib bisphosphate 240 mg on Days 1 to 5 of every 14-day cycle. Participants continued this schedule for 8 weeks. The treatment drug was supposed to be stopped any time in case of disease progression. All participants were followed-up every 8 weeks for tumor assessment, while the participant remained in the treatment extension period.
2037EG000
Group 2Daily Dosing Regimen
Eligible participants received oral foretinib bisphosphate 80 mg daily of every 14-day cycle. Participants continued this schedule for 8 weeks. treatment drug was supposed to be stopped any time in case of disease progression. All participants were followed-up every 8 weeks for tumor assessment, while the participant remained in the treatment extension period.
2237EG001

Harm

What it counts
Total, serious adverse events
Time frame
Approximately up to 48 months

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial

Title
A Phase II Study of GSK1363089 (Formerly XL880) for Papillary Renal-Cell Carcinoma (PRC)
NCT number
NCT00726323
Phases
PHASE2
Conditions
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
Interventions
foretinib (formerly GSK1363089 or XL880)
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Results first posted
2017-12-11

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Source

Release
trial-comparisons-2026-03-23-0.1.0
Release manifest SHA-256
f66225897fbf258b57ea10bdacfd0347d3cdfda93f7f5685234b7e06ea36fa57
AACT copy
2026-03-23
Tables read
outcome_counts.parquet, outcome_measurements.parquet, outcomes.parquet, reported_event_totals.parquet, reported_events.parquet, result_groups.parquet, studies.parquet, ctgov_trial.parquet

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 2

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions. The measures are ConductScience's calculation from them.

For software

Read this comparison from software.

The record is JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/comparisons/v1/NCT00726323-sae